Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Why is the statement "The formation of a compound often involves the destruction of one or more atoms" inconsistent with Dalton's atomic theory?

A. Atoms change the way they are bound together when they form a new substance, but they are neither created nor destroyed.
B. In chemical reactions, compounds are neither created nor destroyed.
C. The formation of a compound often involves the formation of one or more atoms.
D. Atoms combine in simple, whole-number ratios to form compounds.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Dalton's atomic theory asserts that atoms combine in whole-number ratios to form compounds and are not created or destroyed in reactions.


Explanation:

Dalton's atomic theory states that atoms combine in simple, whole-number ratios to form compounds and atoms are neither created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction. This is inconsistent with the notion that the formation of a compound involves the destruction of atoms since atoms are conserved in chemical reactions, only rearranged.


Learn more about Atomic Theory and Chemical Reactions here:

https://brainly.com/question/41008926


We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.