Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's break down the solution step-by-step.
### 1. Understanding the Data:
- We have two players: Allison Fealey and Emily Janson.
- For each player, we have data on hits, no hits, and total at-bats over two years (junior and senior combined).
### 2. Tabulate the Combined Data:
From the problem, we have the combined data for each player:
| Outcome | A. Fealey | E. Janson |
|---------------|-----------|-----------|
| Hit | 90 | 105 |
| No Hit | 200 | 215 |
| Total At Bats | 290 | 320 |
### 3. Calculating Batting Averages:
The batting average is calculated as the number of hits divided by the total number of at-bats. We need to calculate this for each player.
#### a. Batting Average for Allison Fealey:
- Hits: 90
- Total At Bats: 290
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Fealey)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{90}{290} \approx 0.3103 \][/tex]
#### b. Batting Average for Emily Janson:
- Hits: 105
- Total At Bats: 320
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Janson)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{105}{320} \approx 0.3281 \][/tex]
### 4. Summary of Batting Averages:
We now have the batting averages for the combined two years:
| Player | Batting Average |
|-----------------|---------------------|
| Allison Fealey | 0.3103 |
| Emily Janson | 0.3281 |
### 5. Determining the Scholarship Award:
Based on their batting averages, Emily Janson has a higher batting average (0.3281) compared to Allison Fealey (0.3103).
### Conclusion:
Emily Janson has the better batting average over the combined junior and senior years and should therefore be awarded the scholarship.
### 1. Understanding the Data:
- We have two players: Allison Fealey and Emily Janson.
- For each player, we have data on hits, no hits, and total at-bats over two years (junior and senior combined).
### 2. Tabulate the Combined Data:
From the problem, we have the combined data for each player:
| Outcome | A. Fealey | E. Janson |
|---------------|-----------|-----------|
| Hit | 90 | 105 |
| No Hit | 200 | 215 |
| Total At Bats | 290 | 320 |
### 3. Calculating Batting Averages:
The batting average is calculated as the number of hits divided by the total number of at-bats. We need to calculate this for each player.
#### a. Batting Average for Allison Fealey:
- Hits: 90
- Total At Bats: 290
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Fealey)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{90}{290} \approx 0.3103 \][/tex]
#### b. Batting Average for Emily Janson:
- Hits: 105
- Total At Bats: 320
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Janson)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{105}{320} \approx 0.3281 \][/tex]
### 4. Summary of Batting Averages:
We now have the batting averages for the combined two years:
| Player | Batting Average |
|-----------------|---------------------|
| Allison Fealey | 0.3103 |
| Emily Janson | 0.3281 |
### 5. Determining the Scholarship Award:
Based on their batting averages, Emily Janson has a higher batting average (0.3281) compared to Allison Fealey (0.3103).
### Conclusion:
Emily Janson has the better batting average over the combined junior and senior years and should therefore be awarded the scholarship.
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.