At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's break down the solution step-by-step.
### 1. Understanding the Data:
- We have two players: Allison Fealey and Emily Janson.
- For each player, we have data on hits, no hits, and total at-bats over two years (junior and senior combined).
### 2. Tabulate the Combined Data:
From the problem, we have the combined data for each player:
| Outcome | A. Fealey | E. Janson |
|---------------|-----------|-----------|
| Hit | 90 | 105 |
| No Hit | 200 | 215 |
| Total At Bats | 290 | 320 |
### 3. Calculating Batting Averages:
The batting average is calculated as the number of hits divided by the total number of at-bats. We need to calculate this for each player.
#### a. Batting Average for Allison Fealey:
- Hits: 90
- Total At Bats: 290
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Fealey)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{90}{290} \approx 0.3103 \][/tex]
#### b. Batting Average for Emily Janson:
- Hits: 105
- Total At Bats: 320
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Janson)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{105}{320} \approx 0.3281 \][/tex]
### 4. Summary of Batting Averages:
We now have the batting averages for the combined two years:
| Player | Batting Average |
|-----------------|---------------------|
| Allison Fealey | 0.3103 |
| Emily Janson | 0.3281 |
### 5. Determining the Scholarship Award:
Based on their batting averages, Emily Janson has a higher batting average (0.3281) compared to Allison Fealey (0.3103).
### Conclusion:
Emily Janson has the better batting average over the combined junior and senior years and should therefore be awarded the scholarship.
### 1. Understanding the Data:
- We have two players: Allison Fealey and Emily Janson.
- For each player, we have data on hits, no hits, and total at-bats over two years (junior and senior combined).
### 2. Tabulate the Combined Data:
From the problem, we have the combined data for each player:
| Outcome | A. Fealey | E. Janson |
|---------------|-----------|-----------|
| Hit | 90 | 105 |
| No Hit | 200 | 215 |
| Total At Bats | 290 | 320 |
### 3. Calculating Batting Averages:
The batting average is calculated as the number of hits divided by the total number of at-bats. We need to calculate this for each player.
#### a. Batting Average for Allison Fealey:
- Hits: 90
- Total At Bats: 290
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Fealey)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{90}{290} \approx 0.3103 \][/tex]
#### b. Batting Average for Emily Janson:
- Hits: 105
- Total At Bats: 320
[tex]\[ \text{Batting Average (Janson)} = \frac{\text{Hits}}{\text{Total At Bats}} = \frac{105}{320} \approx 0.3281 \][/tex]
### 4. Summary of Batting Averages:
We now have the batting averages for the combined two years:
| Player | Batting Average |
|-----------------|---------------------|
| Allison Fealey | 0.3103 |
| Emily Janson | 0.3281 |
### 5. Determining the Scholarship Award:
Based on their batting averages, Emily Janson has a higher batting average (0.3281) compared to Allison Fealey (0.3103).
### Conclusion:
Emily Janson has the better batting average over the combined junior and senior years and should therefore be awarded the scholarship.
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.