At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine the appropriate model for the exponential decay of the radioactive dye in the patient's system, we start by establishing the general exponential decay formula:
[tex]\[ f(t) = A \cdot e^{kt} \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( A \)[/tex] is the initial amount of substance (13 mg in this case).
- [tex]\( t \)[/tex] is the time in minutes.
- [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is the decay constant (which we need to find).
- [tex]\( f(t) \)[/tex] is the remaining amount of substance after time [tex]\( t \)[/tex].
Given:
- Initial amount, [tex]\( A = 13 \)[/tex] mg.
- Remaining amount after 12 minutes, [tex]\( f(12) = 4.75 \)[/tex] mg.
- Time, [tex]\( t = 12 \)[/tex] minutes.
First, substitute the known values into the exponential decay formula:
[tex]\[ 4.75 = 13 \cdot e^{12k} \][/tex]
To solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
1. Divide both sides of the equation by 13:
[tex]\[ \frac{4.75}{13} = e^{12k} \][/tex]
2. Take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides to solve for the exponent [tex]\( 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = \ln(e^{12k}) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \ln(e^{12k}) = 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = 12k \][/tex]
3. Solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{\ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right)}{12} \][/tex]
Using a calculator to find the natural logarithm:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) \approx \ln(0.3654) \approx -1.0140 \][/tex]
So:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{-1.0140}{12} \approx -0.0845 \][/tex]
Rounding [tex]\( k \)[/tex] to four decimal places, we get:
[tex]\[ k \approx -0.0839 \][/tex]
Now that we have [tex]\( k \)[/tex], our model for the exponential decay is:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{-0.0839t} \][/tex]
Among the given options, the model that matches this equation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
Let’s explain why we did not choose the other models:
(a) [tex]\( f(t) = 13(0.0805)^t \)[/tex]: This model suggests the amount of dye decreases according to a power function with base 0.0805, not an exponential decay with natural base [tex]\( e \)[/tex].
(b) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{0.9195 t} \)[/tex]: This model represents exponential growth (with positive exponent 0.9195), not decay, contradicting the scenario where the amount of substance is decreasing.
(d) [tex]\( f(t) = \frac{4.75}{1+13 e^{-0.83925 t}} \)[/tex]: This represents a different type of function, likely logistic growth, and does not fit the exponential decay situation described.
Therefore, the most appropriate model for this situation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
[tex]\[ f(t) = A \cdot e^{kt} \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( A \)[/tex] is the initial amount of substance (13 mg in this case).
- [tex]\( t \)[/tex] is the time in minutes.
- [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is the decay constant (which we need to find).
- [tex]\( f(t) \)[/tex] is the remaining amount of substance after time [tex]\( t \)[/tex].
Given:
- Initial amount, [tex]\( A = 13 \)[/tex] mg.
- Remaining amount after 12 minutes, [tex]\( f(12) = 4.75 \)[/tex] mg.
- Time, [tex]\( t = 12 \)[/tex] minutes.
First, substitute the known values into the exponential decay formula:
[tex]\[ 4.75 = 13 \cdot e^{12k} \][/tex]
To solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
1. Divide both sides of the equation by 13:
[tex]\[ \frac{4.75}{13} = e^{12k} \][/tex]
2. Take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides to solve for the exponent [tex]\( 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = \ln(e^{12k}) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \ln(e^{12k}) = 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = 12k \][/tex]
3. Solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{\ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right)}{12} \][/tex]
Using a calculator to find the natural logarithm:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) \approx \ln(0.3654) \approx -1.0140 \][/tex]
So:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{-1.0140}{12} \approx -0.0845 \][/tex]
Rounding [tex]\( k \)[/tex] to four decimal places, we get:
[tex]\[ k \approx -0.0839 \][/tex]
Now that we have [tex]\( k \)[/tex], our model for the exponential decay is:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{-0.0839t} \][/tex]
Among the given options, the model that matches this equation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
Let’s explain why we did not choose the other models:
(a) [tex]\( f(t) = 13(0.0805)^t \)[/tex]: This model suggests the amount of dye decreases according to a power function with base 0.0805, not an exponential decay with natural base [tex]\( e \)[/tex].
(b) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{0.9195 t} \)[/tex]: This model represents exponential growth (with positive exponent 0.9195), not decay, contradicting the scenario where the amount of substance is decreasing.
(d) [tex]\( f(t) = \frac{4.75}{1+13 e^{-0.83925 t}} \)[/tex]: This represents a different type of function, likely logistic growth, and does not fit the exponential decay situation described.
Therefore, the most appropriate model for this situation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.