At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
To determine the appropriate model for the exponential decay of the radioactive dye in the patient's system, we start by establishing the general exponential decay formula:
[tex]\[ f(t) = A \cdot e^{kt} \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( A \)[/tex] is the initial amount of substance (13 mg in this case).
- [tex]\( t \)[/tex] is the time in minutes.
- [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is the decay constant (which we need to find).
- [tex]\( f(t) \)[/tex] is the remaining amount of substance after time [tex]\( t \)[/tex].
Given:
- Initial amount, [tex]\( A = 13 \)[/tex] mg.
- Remaining amount after 12 minutes, [tex]\( f(12) = 4.75 \)[/tex] mg.
- Time, [tex]\( t = 12 \)[/tex] minutes.
First, substitute the known values into the exponential decay formula:
[tex]\[ 4.75 = 13 \cdot e^{12k} \][/tex]
To solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
1. Divide both sides of the equation by 13:
[tex]\[ \frac{4.75}{13} = e^{12k} \][/tex]
2. Take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides to solve for the exponent [tex]\( 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = \ln(e^{12k}) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \ln(e^{12k}) = 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = 12k \][/tex]
3. Solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{\ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right)}{12} \][/tex]
Using a calculator to find the natural logarithm:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) \approx \ln(0.3654) \approx -1.0140 \][/tex]
So:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{-1.0140}{12} \approx -0.0845 \][/tex]
Rounding [tex]\( k \)[/tex] to four decimal places, we get:
[tex]\[ k \approx -0.0839 \][/tex]
Now that we have [tex]\( k \)[/tex], our model for the exponential decay is:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{-0.0839t} \][/tex]
Among the given options, the model that matches this equation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
Let’s explain why we did not choose the other models:
(a) [tex]\( f(t) = 13(0.0805)^t \)[/tex]: This model suggests the amount of dye decreases according to a power function with base 0.0805, not an exponential decay with natural base [tex]\( e \)[/tex].
(b) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{0.9195 t} \)[/tex]: This model represents exponential growth (with positive exponent 0.9195), not decay, contradicting the scenario where the amount of substance is decreasing.
(d) [tex]\( f(t) = \frac{4.75}{1+13 e^{-0.83925 t}} \)[/tex]: This represents a different type of function, likely logistic growth, and does not fit the exponential decay situation described.
Therefore, the most appropriate model for this situation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
[tex]\[ f(t) = A \cdot e^{kt} \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( A \)[/tex] is the initial amount of substance (13 mg in this case).
- [tex]\( t \)[/tex] is the time in minutes.
- [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is the decay constant (which we need to find).
- [tex]\( f(t) \)[/tex] is the remaining amount of substance after time [tex]\( t \)[/tex].
Given:
- Initial amount, [tex]\( A = 13 \)[/tex] mg.
- Remaining amount after 12 minutes, [tex]\( f(12) = 4.75 \)[/tex] mg.
- Time, [tex]\( t = 12 \)[/tex] minutes.
First, substitute the known values into the exponential decay formula:
[tex]\[ 4.75 = 13 \cdot e^{12k} \][/tex]
To solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
1. Divide both sides of the equation by 13:
[tex]\[ \frac{4.75}{13} = e^{12k} \][/tex]
2. Take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides to solve for the exponent [tex]\( 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = \ln(e^{12k}) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \ln(e^{12k}) = 12k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) = 12k \][/tex]
3. Solve for [tex]\( k \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{\ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right)}{12} \][/tex]
Using a calculator to find the natural logarithm:
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{4.75}{13}\right) \approx \ln(0.3654) \approx -1.0140 \][/tex]
So:
[tex]\[ k = \frac{-1.0140}{12} \approx -0.0845 \][/tex]
Rounding [tex]\( k \)[/tex] to four decimal places, we get:
[tex]\[ k \approx -0.0839 \][/tex]
Now that we have [tex]\( k \)[/tex], our model for the exponential decay is:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{-0.0839t} \][/tex]
Among the given options, the model that matches this equation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 \cdot e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
Let’s explain why we did not choose the other models:
(a) [tex]\( f(t) = 13(0.0805)^t \)[/tex]: This model suggests the amount of dye decreases according to a power function with base 0.0805, not an exponential decay with natural base [tex]\( e \)[/tex].
(b) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{0.9195 t} \)[/tex]: This model represents exponential growth (with positive exponent 0.9195), not decay, contradicting the scenario where the amount of substance is decreasing.
(d) [tex]\( f(t) = \frac{4.75}{1+13 e^{-0.83925 t}} \)[/tex]: This represents a different type of function, likely logistic growth, and does not fit the exponential decay situation described.
Therefore, the most appropriate model for this situation is:
(c) [tex]\( f(t) = 13 e^{(-0.0839 t)} \)[/tex]
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.
