Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Identify some of the differences between arbitration and a trial. (Check all that apply.)

- Arbitration is typically less formal than a trial.
- Arbitration may be binding or non-binding, while a trial verdict is binding.
- Arbitration can often be faster and less expensive than a trial.
- The rules of evidence may be more relaxed in arbitration than in a trial.
- An arbitrator, rather than a judge or jury, makes the final decision in arbitration.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Arbitration and trials differ in decision-makers, formality, and finality of decisions.


Explanation:

Differences between Arbitration and Trial:

  1. Decision-Maker: In arbitration, a neutral third party makes the final decision, whereas in a trial, a judge or jury decides the case.
  2. Formality: Arbitration is less formal than a trial, offering more flexibility in procedures and rules.
  3. Finality of Decision: Arbitration decisions are typically final, whereas trials might have options for appeals.

Learn more about Arbitration vs. Trial here:

https://brainly.com/question/43877631


We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.