Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Identify some of the differences between arbitration and a trial. (Check all that apply.)

- Arbitration is typically less formal than a trial.
- Arbitration may be binding or non-binding, while a trial verdict is binding.
- Arbitration can often be faster and less expensive than a trial.
- The rules of evidence may be more relaxed in arbitration than in a trial.
- An arbitrator, rather than a judge or jury, makes the final decision in arbitration.

Sagot :

Final answer:

Arbitration and trials differ in decision-makers, formality, and finality of decisions.


Explanation:

Differences between Arbitration and Trial:

  1. Decision-Maker: In arbitration, a neutral third party makes the final decision, whereas in a trial, a judge or jury decides the case.
  2. Formality: Arbitration is less formal than a trial, offering more flexibility in procedures and rules.
  3. Finality of Decision: Arbitration decisions are typically final, whereas trials might have options for appeals.

Learn more about Arbitration vs. Trial here:

https://brainly.com/question/43877631


Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.