At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Identify some of the differences between arbitration and a trial. (Check all that apply.)

- Arbitration is typically less formal than a trial.
- Arbitration may be binding or non-binding, while a trial verdict is binding.
- Arbitration can often be faster and less expensive than a trial.
- The rules of evidence may be more relaxed in arbitration than in a trial.
- An arbitrator, rather than a judge or jury, makes the final decision in arbitration.

Sagot :

Final answer:

Arbitration and trials differ in decision-makers, formality, and finality of decisions.


Explanation:

Differences between Arbitration and Trial:

  1. Decision-Maker: In arbitration, a neutral third party makes the final decision, whereas in a trial, a judge or jury decides the case.
  2. Formality: Arbitration is less formal than a trial, offering more flexibility in procedures and rules.
  3. Finality of Decision: Arbitration decisions are typically final, whereas trials might have options for appeals.

Learn more about Arbitration vs. Trial here:

https://brainly.com/question/43877631