Answered

Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Identify some of the differences between arbitration and a trial. (Check all that apply.)

- Arbitration is typically less formal than a trial.
- Arbitration may be binding or non-binding, while a trial verdict is binding.
- Arbitration can often be faster and less expensive than a trial.
- The rules of evidence may be more relaxed in arbitration than in a trial.
- An arbitrator, rather than a judge or jury, makes the final decision in arbitration.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Arbitration and trials differ in decision-makers, formality, and finality of decisions.


Explanation:

Differences between Arbitration and Trial:

  1. Decision-Maker: In arbitration, a neutral third party makes the final decision, whereas in a trial, a judge or jury decides the case.
  2. Formality: Arbitration is less formal than a trial, offering more flexibility in procedures and rules.
  3. Finality of Decision: Arbitration decisions are typically final, whereas trials might have options for appeals.

Learn more about Arbitration vs. Trial here:

https://brainly.com/question/43877631


We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.