Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Ask your questions and receive precise answers from experienced professionals across different disciplines. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The claim that Blacks were not citizens because their ancestors were not included in the Constitution is refuted by the fact that their forced migration impacted their citizenship status.
Explanation:
The claim in Taney's passage from the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was refuted by the statement:
- Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here.
This counterclaim challenges Taney's assertion by highlighting the historical context of forced migration and the impact it had on the citizenship status of Black individuals.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford here:
https://brainly.com/question/1381352
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.