Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney:

"The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them."

Which statement best describes the fallacy in this passage?

A. Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship.
B. Justice Taney uses the argument that Black people are not citizens to prove that they are not citizens.
C. Justice Taney assumes that the other justices on the court would agree with him about citizenship.
D. Justice Taney uses the argument that Dred Scott is an enslaved person to prove that he is not a citizen.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Justice Taney wrongly used the lack of citizenship for Black people as a basis to deny them rights and privileges.


Explanation:

Justice Taney uses the argument that Black people are not citizens to prove that they are not citizens. In his opinion in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Taney asserted that enslaved African Americans could not be citizens of the United States, thereby denying them the rights and privileges granted by the Constitution. This flawed logic was central to the court's decision to deny Dred Scott's freedom and reinforced the deeply unjust institution of slavery at that time.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case here:

https://brainly.com/question/41672761


We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.