Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Which do you think is more valuable in expressing the relationship between calories and sugarlong dashthe covariance or the coefficient of​ correlation? Explain.
A.
The coefficient of correlation is more valuable. It is the better measure for positive relationships. The coefficient of correlation is easier to interpret because it can only take a value between minus1 and​ 1, inclusive, while the covariance can be any real value.
B.
The covariance is more valuable. It is an exact measure of the strength of a linear relationship. The covariance is easier to interpret because it can be any real​ value, while the coefficient of correlation can only take a value between minus1 and​ 1, inclusive.
C.
The covariance is more valuable. It is not susceptible to the negative effects of lurking variables. The covariance is easier to interpret because it can be any real​ value, while the coefficient of correlation can only take a value between minus1 and​ 1, inclusive.
D.
The coefficient of correlation is more valuable. It can be used to determine the relative strength of a linear relationship. The coefficient of correlation is easier to interpret because it can only take a value between minus1 and​ 1, inclusive, while the covariance can be any real value.

Sagot :

We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.