Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

On a number line, a number, [tex]b[/tex], is located the same distance from 0 as another number, [tex]a[/tex], but in the opposite direction. The number [tex]b[/tex] varies directly with the number [tex]a[/tex]. For example, [tex]b=2 \frac{3}{4}[/tex] when [tex]a=-2 \frac{3}{4}[/tex]. Which equation represents this direct variation between [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]b[/tex]?

A. [tex]b=-a[/tex]
B. [tex]-b=-a[/tex]
C. [tex]b-a=0[/tex]
D. [tex]b(-a)=0[/tex]


Sagot :

We need to determine the correct equation that represents the relationship between the numbers [tex]\(a\)[/tex] and [tex]\(b\)[/tex]. Let's analyze each of the provided options step by step:

1. Option 1: [tex]\(b = -a\)[/tex]

If a number [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is located the same distance from 0 as another number [tex]\(a\)[/tex], but in the opposite direction, then [tex]\(b\)[/tex] should indeed be the negative of [tex]\(a\)[/tex]. For example, if [tex]\(a = 3\)[/tex], then [tex]\(b\)[/tex] should be [tex]\(-3\)[/tex], and if [tex]\(a = -2\)[/tex], then [tex]\(b\)[/tex] should be [tex]\(2\)[/tex]. This is described perfectly by the equation [tex]\(b = -a\)[/tex]. Furthermore, this matches the example given where [tex]\( b = 2\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex] when [tex]\( a = -2\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex].

2. Option 2: [tex]\(-b = -a\)[/tex]

Simplifying this, we get [tex]\(b = a\)[/tex]. This would imply that [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is exactly the same as [tex]\(a\)[/tex], which contradicts the given scenario that [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is in the opposite direction to [tex]\(a\)[/tex].

3. Option 3: [tex]\(b - a = 0\)[/tex]

Simplifying this equation, we get [tex]\(b = a\)[/tex]. Again, this implies that [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is the same as [tex]\(a\)[/tex], which is not correct because [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is supposed to be in the opposite direction to [tex]\(a\)[/tex].

4. Option 4: [tex]\(b(-a) = 0\)[/tex]

For [tex]\(b(-a) = 0\)[/tex] to hold true for all values of [tex]\(a\)[/tex], [tex]\(b\)[/tex] would always have to be [tex]\(0\)[/tex]. This does not represent a useful or general relationship between [tex]\(a\)[/tex] and [tex]\(b\)[/tex], as it doesn't apply to cases where [tex]\(a\)[/tex] or [tex]\(b\)[/tex] are non-zero.

Therefore, the correct equation that represents the direct variation and the given conditions is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{b = -a} \][/tex]
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.