Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which reflection produces the given image of a line segment with the endpoints changing from [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex], let's analyze the possible reflections one by one.
### Original Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex]
### New Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]
### Possible Reflections:
1. Reflection across the [tex]\(x\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-4, 6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-4, 6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
2. Reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] match the given new endpoints perfectly. Therefore, this is the correct reflection.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = -x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] might appear to match, but the order and signs of the points are incorrect compared to our desired new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Therefore, this is not the correct reflection.
### Conclusion:
The reflection that transforms the endpoints [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to the new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] is a reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A reflection of the line segment across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
### Original Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex]
### New Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]
### Possible Reflections:
1. Reflection across the [tex]\(x\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-4, 6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-4, 6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
2. Reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] match the given new endpoints perfectly. Therefore, this is the correct reflection.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = -x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] might appear to match, but the order and signs of the points are incorrect compared to our desired new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Therefore, this is not the correct reflection.
### Conclusion:
The reflection that transforms the endpoints [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to the new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] is a reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A reflection of the line segment across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.
