Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
To determine which reflection produces the given image of a line segment with the endpoints changing from [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex], let's analyze the possible reflections one by one.
### Original Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex]
### New Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]
### Possible Reflections:
1. Reflection across the [tex]\(x\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-4, 6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-4, 6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
2. Reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] match the given new endpoints perfectly. Therefore, this is the correct reflection.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = -x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] might appear to match, but the order and signs of the points are incorrect compared to our desired new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Therefore, this is not the correct reflection.
### Conclusion:
The reflection that transforms the endpoints [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to the new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] is a reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A reflection of the line segment across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
### Original Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex]
### New Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]
### Possible Reflections:
1. Reflection across the [tex]\(x\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-4, 6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-4, 6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
2. Reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] match the given new endpoints perfectly. Therefore, this is the correct reflection.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = -x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] might appear to match, but the order and signs of the points are incorrect compared to our desired new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Therefore, this is not the correct reflection.
### Conclusion:
The reflection that transforms the endpoints [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to the new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] is a reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A reflection of the line segment across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
