Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The courts would use strict scrutiny as the legal standard in cases of discrimination based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion, requiring a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored measures.
Explanation:
Strict scrutiny is the legal standard that the courts would use in deciding a case involving discrimination based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. Under strict scrutiny, the government needs to prove a compelling governmental interest and show that no alternative means are available to achieve the goal.
For example, in cases of affirmative action, which aims to address discrimination based on race or ethnicity, strict scrutiny is applied to assess the necessity of racial discrimination to achieve a compelling governmental interest.
Strict scrutiny sets a high bar for justifying discriminatory practices based on certain protected characteristics, emphasizing the need for a compelling reason and narrowly tailored measures.
Learn more about Legal standards for discrimination cases here:
https://brainly.com/question/28259375
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.