Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
To determine which expression is equivalent to [tex]\((f+g)(4)\)[/tex], we need to understand the meaning of [tex]\((f+g)(4)\)[/tex]. This expression represents the value of the function [tex]\( (f+g) \)[/tex] evaluated at [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]. The sum of two functions [tex]\( f \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] can be written as:
[tex]\[ (f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) \][/tex]
So, evaluating this sum at [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex] gives us:
[tex]\[ (f+g)(4) = f(4) + g(4) \][/tex]
According to this, we need to add the values of the functions [tex]\( f \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] when [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex].
Now let's consider each given expression to see if it is equivalent to [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex]:
1. [tex]\( (4) + D(4) \)[/tex]
- There is no function defined as [tex]\( D \)[/tex] in the problem, so this does not match [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
2. [tex]\( f(x) + g(4) \)[/tex]
- This expression adds the value of [tex]\( f \)[/tex] at some unspecified [tex]\( x \)[/tex] to the value of [tex]\( g \)[/tex] at [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex]. This is not the same as [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( \mu(4+g(4)) \)[/tex]
- This expression involves a function [tex]\( \mu \)[/tex], which is not defined, and it doesn't represent the addition of [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
4. [tex]\( 4(f(x) + g(x)) \)[/tex]
- This expression simplifies as [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex] times the sum of [tex]\( f \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] evaluated at some unspecified [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This is also not equivalent to [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
After reviewing each option, we find that none of the given choices directly matches [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex] in the context given.
However, sometimes there might be a formatting issue or interpretation context missing. Please ensure the context and expressions are considered accurately. If we re-evaluate:
The question and attempted solutions might also involve a representation interpretation. Without additional clarifications, consider augmenting the precise evaluation again. Given logical consistency, (none if interpreted directly resolves a pure verification context).
Ultimately, ideally, ensuring representation availability like [tex]\(f(4)+g(4)\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ (f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) \][/tex]
So, evaluating this sum at [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex] gives us:
[tex]\[ (f+g)(4) = f(4) + g(4) \][/tex]
According to this, we need to add the values of the functions [tex]\( f \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] when [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex].
Now let's consider each given expression to see if it is equivalent to [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex]:
1. [tex]\( (4) + D(4) \)[/tex]
- There is no function defined as [tex]\( D \)[/tex] in the problem, so this does not match [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
2. [tex]\( f(x) + g(4) \)[/tex]
- This expression adds the value of [tex]\( f \)[/tex] at some unspecified [tex]\( x \)[/tex] to the value of [tex]\( g \)[/tex] at [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex]. This is not the same as [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( \mu(4+g(4)) \)[/tex]
- This expression involves a function [tex]\( \mu \)[/tex], which is not defined, and it doesn't represent the addition of [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
4. [tex]\( 4(f(x) + g(x)) \)[/tex]
- This expression simplifies as [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex] times the sum of [tex]\( f \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] evaluated at some unspecified [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This is also not equivalent to [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex].
After reviewing each option, we find that none of the given choices directly matches [tex]\( f(4) + g(4) \)[/tex] in the context given.
However, sometimes there might be a formatting issue or interpretation context missing. Please ensure the context and expressions are considered accurately. If we re-evaluate:
The question and attempted solutions might also involve a representation interpretation. Without additional clarifications, consider augmenting the precise evaluation again. Given logical consistency, (none if interpreted directly resolves a pure verification context).
Ultimately, ideally, ensuring representation availability like [tex]\(f(4)+g(4)\)[/tex].
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.
