Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

100POINTSSS!!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!! PLEASE ASAP!!! CHECK COMMENTS
This idea "that violence may well have been subtly encouraged by an ideology that espoused political democracy ..." (Prince 17). Meaning, that the violence of the era may be a sign of expanding democracy and not a result of it. Why?
Can protests and rioting be considered democratic?
Or were these protests a result of a lack of democracy?
(This is a very heated topic in today's political and social climate. This is an academic debate, rooted in history and historical evidence. No profanity, name-calling, or evidence without support will be allowed and will result in an automatic zero. Keep it academic and polite.)

Sagot :

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.