Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Which statement best describes the functions represented by the tables?

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline [tex]$x$[/tex] & [tex]$p(x)$[/tex] \\
\hline 0 & 4 \\
\hline 1 & 16 \\
\hline 2 & 64 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline [tex]$x$[/tex] & [tex]$q(x)$[/tex] \\
\hline 0 & 3 \\
\hline 2 & 15 \\
\hline 5 & 33 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

A. Both functions are nonlinear.

B. Both functions are linear.

C. Function [tex]$q$[/tex] is nonlinear but not exponential.

D. Function [tex]$p$[/tex] is nonlinear and exponential.

Sagot :

Let's examine the given functions using their tabulated values.

For [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex], the table is:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline$x$ & $p(x)$ \\ \hline 0 & 4 \\ \hline 1 & 16 \\ \hline 2 & 64 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
We can observe that the values of [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex] follow a specific pattern:

- When [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( p(x) = 4 \)[/tex].
- When [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( p(x) = 16 \)[/tex].
- When [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( p(x) = 64 \)[/tex].

If we observe carefully, each value of [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex] seems to multiply by 4 as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases by 1:
[tex]\[ 4 \cdot 4 = 16 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 16 \cdot 4 = 64 \][/tex]

This indicates that [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex] is an exponential function of the form:
[tex]\[ p(x) = 4 \cdot 4^x \][/tex]
Thus, [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex] is both nonlinear and exponential.

Next, let’s analyze [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex] from its table:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline$x$ & $q(x)$ \\ \hline 0 & 3 \\ \hline 2 & 15 \\ \hline 5 & 33 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
The increments in [tex]\( x \)[/tex] are not uniform which complicates the analysis. Let's look at the change in [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex]:

- From [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex] changes from 3 to 15.
- From [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex] changes from 15 to 33.

The changes are not consistent with a linear pattern since the increments are different:
[tex]\[ q(2) - q(0) = 15 - 3 = 12 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ q(5) - q(2) = 33 - 15 = 18 \][/tex]

Also, there's no evident multiplicative pattern indicating it's not exponential. Therefore, [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex] is neither linear nor exponential, meaning it is a general nonlinear function.

Based on these observations:

- [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex] is nonlinear and follows an exponential pattern.
- [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex] does not follow a linear or exponential pattern.

Thus, the correct statement describing these functions is:

A. Both functions are nonlinear.

This matches our detailed analysis of the functions [tex]\( p(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q(x) \)[/tex].