Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Sure, let's explore a situation where Greedy Best-First Search (GBFS) can fail to find an optimal solution, whereas A Search would succeed in this task.
### Example Scenario
Imagine we have a grid as a maze where the following characters are used:
- `S` represents the Start.
- `G` represents the Goal.
- `#` represents walls which are impassable.
- Numeric values represent the traversal cost for each cell.
Below is an example grid:
```
S 1 1 1 10
1 10 # 10 10
1 1 1 1 G
```
Grid Layout:
```
S 1 1 1 10
1 10 # 10 10
1 1 1 1 G
```
### Greedy Best-First Search Path
Greedy Best-First Search focuses solely on the heuristic (H), which in this scenario could be the straight-line distance to the goal (G). Here’s how GBFS might approach the grid:
- Start at `S`.
- Move directly towards the minimum heuristic value, choosing the cells that seem closest to the goal.
- Possible path: `S -> (0,1) -> (0,2) -> (0,3) -> (0,4) -> (2,4) -> G`
### Path and Total Cost with Greedy Best-First Search
Following the path: `S -> (0,1) -> (0,2) -> (0,3) -> (0,4) -> (2,4) -> G`:
- `S` to `(0,1)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,1)` to `(0,2)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,2)` to `(0,3)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,3)` to `(0,4)`: Cost = 10
- `(0,4)` to `(2,4)`: Cost = Assumed Heuristic Steps
- Total Cost (assuming 3 heuristic steps from `(0,4)` to G): 1 + 1 + 1 + 10 + 3 = 16
This path might be suboptimal due to the high cost at `(0,4)`.
### A Search Path
A Search takes into account not just the heuristic (H), but also the cost from the start node to the current node, known as the g-cost (G). Therefore, it combines both aspects into its decision-making:
A Search Path:
Following the optimal path: `S -> (0,1) -> (1,0) -> (2,0) -> (2,1) -> (2,2) -> (2,3) -> G`
- `S` to `(0,1)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,1)` to `(1,0)`: Cost = 1
- `(1,0)` to `(2,0)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,0)` to `(2,1)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,1)` to `(2,2)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,2)` to `(2,3)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,3)` to `G`: Cost = 1
- Total Cost: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 7
### Explanation
- Greedy Best-First Search: This approach picks what seems to be the best immediate option based solely on the heuristic. As a result, it may choose a path with lower heuristic values but higher overall costs, leading to potentially suboptimal solutions. In this example, GBFS chose the path involving the high-cost cell `(0,4)`, resulting in a higher total cost.
- A Search: A balances both the cost to reach a node and the heuristic estimate to the goal, ensuring it assesses paths more holistically. This provides a more reliable and often optimal solution, as A avoids high-cost intermediate steps such as cell `(0,4)` in favor of lower cumulative cost paths.
### Conclusion
The failure of Greedy Best-First Search to find the optimal path in this example highlights its limitation of being shortsighted, focusing only on immediate heuristic gains. In contrast, A Search effectively finds the optimal path by considering both the cost incurred and the potential cost to reach the goal, demonstrating its robustness in pathfinding tasks.
### Example Scenario
Imagine we have a grid as a maze where the following characters are used:
- `S` represents the Start.
- `G` represents the Goal.
- `#` represents walls which are impassable.
- Numeric values represent the traversal cost for each cell.
Below is an example grid:
```
S 1 1 1 10
1 10 # 10 10
1 1 1 1 G
```
Grid Layout:
```
S 1 1 1 10
1 10 # 10 10
1 1 1 1 G
```
### Greedy Best-First Search Path
Greedy Best-First Search focuses solely on the heuristic (H), which in this scenario could be the straight-line distance to the goal (G). Here’s how GBFS might approach the grid:
- Start at `S`.
- Move directly towards the minimum heuristic value, choosing the cells that seem closest to the goal.
- Possible path: `S -> (0,1) -> (0,2) -> (0,3) -> (0,4) -> (2,4) -> G`
### Path and Total Cost with Greedy Best-First Search
Following the path: `S -> (0,1) -> (0,2) -> (0,3) -> (0,4) -> (2,4) -> G`:
- `S` to `(0,1)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,1)` to `(0,2)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,2)` to `(0,3)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,3)` to `(0,4)`: Cost = 10
- `(0,4)` to `(2,4)`: Cost = Assumed Heuristic Steps
- Total Cost (assuming 3 heuristic steps from `(0,4)` to G): 1 + 1 + 1 + 10 + 3 = 16
This path might be suboptimal due to the high cost at `(0,4)`.
### A Search Path
A Search takes into account not just the heuristic (H), but also the cost from the start node to the current node, known as the g-cost (G). Therefore, it combines both aspects into its decision-making:
A Search Path:
Following the optimal path: `S -> (0,1) -> (1,0) -> (2,0) -> (2,1) -> (2,2) -> (2,3) -> G`
- `S` to `(0,1)`: Cost = 1
- `(0,1)` to `(1,0)`: Cost = 1
- `(1,0)` to `(2,0)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,0)` to `(2,1)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,1)` to `(2,2)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,2)` to `(2,3)`: Cost = 1
- `(2,3)` to `G`: Cost = 1
- Total Cost: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 7
### Explanation
- Greedy Best-First Search: This approach picks what seems to be the best immediate option based solely on the heuristic. As a result, it may choose a path with lower heuristic values but higher overall costs, leading to potentially suboptimal solutions. In this example, GBFS chose the path involving the high-cost cell `(0,4)`, resulting in a higher total cost.
- A Search: A balances both the cost to reach a node and the heuristic estimate to the goal, ensuring it assesses paths more holistically. This provides a more reliable and often optimal solution, as A avoids high-cost intermediate steps such as cell `(0,4)` in favor of lower cumulative cost paths.
### Conclusion
The failure of Greedy Best-First Search to find the optimal path in this example highlights its limitation of being shortsighted, focusing only on immediate heuristic gains. In contrast, A Search effectively finds the optimal path by considering both the cost incurred and the potential cost to reach the goal, demonstrating its robustness in pathfinding tasks.
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.
