Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which table represents the graph of a logarithmic function with both an [tex]\( x \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept., let's translate the provided information into a mathematical context:
A logarithmic function of the form [tex]\( y = \log_b(x) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] and typically intersects the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis when [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] because [tex]\( \log_b(1) = 0 \)[/tex]. It generally intersects the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( x = b^{-y} \)[/tex].
In the given table, we have the following data:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 0.5 & -0.631 \\ \hline 1.5 & 0.369 \\ \hline 2.5 & 0.834 \\ \hline 3.5 & 1.146 \\ \hline 4.5 & 1.369 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
From this table, we observe:
- For [tex]\( x = 0.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = -0.631 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.369 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 2.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.834 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 3.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.146 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.369 \)[/tex]
Let's analyze these pairs:
1. The point [tex]\( (0.5, -0.631) \)[/tex] implies a negative [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which is consistent with the logarithmic function, as [tex]\( \log_b(0.5) \)[/tex] is negative for any base [tex]\( b > 1 \)[/tex].
2. The point [tex]\( (1.5, 0.369) \)[/tex] suggests a positive [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which indicates that for [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex], the function value is positive.
3. The value [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is increasing as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, which is also characteristic of a logarithmic function when [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex].
Given these points, the table represents a logarithmic function, but we need to confirm if the intercepts coordinate with our bounds.
An intercept understanding:
- [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept: At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], we typically intersect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept: The table does not explicitly show [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x \)[/tex] yielding exactly zero [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
From these, the given intercepts seem consistent with logarithmic characteristics.
Therefore, the table provided does represent the graph of a logarithmic function with both [tex]\( x \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercepts.
A logarithmic function of the form [tex]\( y = \log_b(x) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] and typically intersects the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis when [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] because [tex]\( \log_b(1) = 0 \)[/tex]. It generally intersects the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( x = b^{-y} \)[/tex].
In the given table, we have the following data:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 0.5 & -0.631 \\ \hline 1.5 & 0.369 \\ \hline 2.5 & 0.834 \\ \hline 3.5 & 1.146 \\ \hline 4.5 & 1.369 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
From this table, we observe:
- For [tex]\( x = 0.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = -0.631 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.369 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 2.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.834 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 3.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.146 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.369 \)[/tex]
Let's analyze these pairs:
1. The point [tex]\( (0.5, -0.631) \)[/tex] implies a negative [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which is consistent with the logarithmic function, as [tex]\( \log_b(0.5) \)[/tex] is negative for any base [tex]\( b > 1 \)[/tex].
2. The point [tex]\( (1.5, 0.369) \)[/tex] suggests a positive [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which indicates that for [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex], the function value is positive.
3. The value [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is increasing as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, which is also characteristic of a logarithmic function when [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex].
Given these points, the table represents a logarithmic function, but we need to confirm if the intercepts coordinate with our bounds.
An intercept understanding:
- [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept: At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], we typically intersect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept: The table does not explicitly show [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x \)[/tex] yielding exactly zero [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
From these, the given intercepts seem consistent with logarithmic characteristics.
Therefore, the table provided does represent the graph of a logarithmic function with both [tex]\( x \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercepts.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.