At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
To compare and contrast the piecewise defined functions [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex], we will examine their behavior in different segments of the domain.
### Definitions:
[tex]\[ f(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{rl} -x + 2, & x < 0 \\ x^2 + 1, & x > 0 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} x + 2, & x < 0 \\ x^2 + 2, & x > 0 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
### Comparisons at Specific Points:
We will evaluate and compare [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] at the points [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex].
1. At [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-2) = -(-2) + 2 = 2 + 2 = 4 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(-2) = -2 + 2 = 0 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-2) = 4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(-2) = 0 \][/tex]
2. At [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = -(-1) + 2 = 1 + 2 = 3 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(-1) = -1 + 2 = 1 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(-1) = 1 \][/tex]
3. At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 1^2 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(1) = 1^2 + 2 = 1 + 2 = 3 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(1) = 3 \][/tex]
4. At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 2^2 + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(2) = 2^2 + 2 = 4 + 2 = 6 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 5 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(2) = 6 \][/tex]
### Summary of Results:
- At [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-2) = 4, \quad g(-2) = 0 \][/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = 3, \quad g(-1) = 1 \][/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 2, \quad g(1) = 3 \][/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 5, \quad g(2) = 6 \][/tex]
### Comparison and Contrast:
1. For [tex]\( x < 0 \)[/tex]:
- For negative values, both functions are linear.
- [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases (i.e., slope = -1), while [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] increases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases (i.e., slope = 1).
- The values of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] are higher than those of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] for the same negative [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
2. For [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex]:
- For positive values, both functions are quadratic.
- [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 + 1 \)[/tex] is always less than [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 2 \)[/tex] by exactly 1 for any [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex].
### Conclusion:
While both [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are piecewise defined functions with linear components for [tex]\( x < 0 \)[/tex] and quadratic components for [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex], they differ in both segments of their domain. For [tex]\( x < 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] yields higher values than [tex]\(g(x)\)[/tex]. For [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\(g(x)\)[/tex] exceeds [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] by a constant difference of 1 unit.
### Definitions:
[tex]\[ f(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{rl} -x + 2, & x < 0 \\ x^2 + 1, & x > 0 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} x + 2, & x < 0 \\ x^2 + 2, & x > 0 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
### Comparisons at Specific Points:
We will evaluate and compare [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] at the points [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex].
1. At [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-2) = -(-2) + 2 = 2 + 2 = 4 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(-2) = -2 + 2 = 0 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-2) = 4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(-2) = 0 \][/tex]
2. At [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = -(-1) + 2 = 1 + 2 = 3 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(-1) = -1 + 2 = 1 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(-1) = 1 \][/tex]
3. At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 1^2 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(1) = 1^2 + 2 = 1 + 2 = 3 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(1) = 3 \][/tex]
4. At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 2^2 + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ g(2) = 2^2 + 2 = 4 + 2 = 6 \][/tex]
Thus, at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 5 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ g(2) = 6 \][/tex]
### Summary of Results:
- At [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-2) = 4, \quad g(-2) = 0 \][/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = 3, \quad g(-1) = 1 \][/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 2, \quad g(1) = 3 \][/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 5, \quad g(2) = 6 \][/tex]
### Comparison and Contrast:
1. For [tex]\( x < 0 \)[/tex]:
- For negative values, both functions are linear.
- [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases (i.e., slope = -1), while [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] increases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases (i.e., slope = 1).
- The values of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] are higher than those of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] for the same negative [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
2. For [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex]:
- For positive values, both functions are quadratic.
- [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 + 1 \)[/tex] is always less than [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 2 \)[/tex] by exactly 1 for any [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex].
### Conclusion:
While both [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are piecewise defined functions with linear components for [tex]\( x < 0 \)[/tex] and quadratic components for [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex], they differ in both segments of their domain. For [tex]\( x < 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] yields higher values than [tex]\(g(x)\)[/tex]. For [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\(g(x)\)[/tex] exceeds [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] by a constant difference of 1 unit.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
