Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Let's go through the solution step-by-step to determine the accuracy and precision of the students' measurements.
First, let's compile the measurements:
- Student 1: [tex]\(1600\)[/tex] g
- Student 2: [tex]\(2300\)[/tex] g
- Student 3: [tex]\( \frac{1000 + 1500}{2} = 1250\)[/tex] g (since the measurement is between 1000 and 1500 g)
- Student 4: [tex]\(1750\)[/tex] g
So, the measurements are: [tex]\(1600, 2300, 1250, 1750\)[/tex] (in grams).
Next, we need to calculate the mean (average) of these measurements:
[tex]\[ \text{Mean Measurement} = \frac{1600 + 2300 + 1250 + 1750}{4} = \frac{6900}{4} = 1725 \text{ g} \][/tex]
Now, let's consider the accuracy, which is the difference between the mean measurement and the actual mass of the rabbit:
[tex]\[ \text{Actual Mass} = 1864.3 \text{ g} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{Accuracy} = | \text{Mean Measurement} - \text{Actual Mass} | = |1725 - 1864.3| = 139.3 \text{ g} \][/tex]
Next, we need to evaluate the precision, which is the standard deviation of the measurements. For a set of measurements [tex]\(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4\)[/tex], the standard deviation [tex]\( \sigma \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{(x_1 - \mu)^2 + (x_2 - \mu)^2 + (x_3 - \mu)^2 + (x_4 - \mu)^2}{4 - 1}} \][/tex]
where [tex]\( \mu \)[/tex] is the mean measurement. Calculating each term:
[tex]\[ (x_1 - \mu)^2 = (1600 - 1725)^2 = (-125)^2 = 15625 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (x_2 - \mu)^2 = (2300 - 1725)^2 = 575^2 = 330625 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (x_3 - \mu)^2 = (1250 - 1725)^2 = (-475)^2 = 225625 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (x_4 - \mu)^2 = (1750 - 1725)^2 = 25^2 = 625 \][/tex]
Summing these differences:
[tex]\[ 15625 + 330625 + 225625 + 625 = 572500 \][/tex]
Now, dividing by [tex]\(n-1 = 4-1 = 3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{572500}{3} \approx 190833.33 \][/tex]
Taking the square root gives the standard deviation:
[tex]\[ \sigma = \sqrt{190833.33} \approx 437.01 \text{ g} \][/tex]
Now, let's determine the classification based on accuracy and precision:
1. Accuracy: Given the accuracy threshold of 100g, our calculated accuracy of [tex]\(139.3\)[/tex] g indicates the measurements are not accurate.
2. Precision: Given the precision threshold of 200g, our calculated standard deviation of [tex]\(437.01\)[/tex] g indicates the measurements are not precise.
Given these conditions, the measurements are neither accurate nor precise.
Therefore, the best statement that describes the accuracy and precision of the data is:
A. Neither accurate nor precise
First, let's compile the measurements:
- Student 1: [tex]\(1600\)[/tex] g
- Student 2: [tex]\(2300\)[/tex] g
- Student 3: [tex]\( \frac{1000 + 1500}{2} = 1250\)[/tex] g (since the measurement is between 1000 and 1500 g)
- Student 4: [tex]\(1750\)[/tex] g
So, the measurements are: [tex]\(1600, 2300, 1250, 1750\)[/tex] (in grams).
Next, we need to calculate the mean (average) of these measurements:
[tex]\[ \text{Mean Measurement} = \frac{1600 + 2300 + 1250 + 1750}{4} = \frac{6900}{4} = 1725 \text{ g} \][/tex]
Now, let's consider the accuracy, which is the difference between the mean measurement and the actual mass of the rabbit:
[tex]\[ \text{Actual Mass} = 1864.3 \text{ g} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{Accuracy} = | \text{Mean Measurement} - \text{Actual Mass} | = |1725 - 1864.3| = 139.3 \text{ g} \][/tex]
Next, we need to evaluate the precision, which is the standard deviation of the measurements. For a set of measurements [tex]\(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4\)[/tex], the standard deviation [tex]\( \sigma \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{(x_1 - \mu)^2 + (x_2 - \mu)^2 + (x_3 - \mu)^2 + (x_4 - \mu)^2}{4 - 1}} \][/tex]
where [tex]\( \mu \)[/tex] is the mean measurement. Calculating each term:
[tex]\[ (x_1 - \mu)^2 = (1600 - 1725)^2 = (-125)^2 = 15625 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (x_2 - \mu)^2 = (2300 - 1725)^2 = 575^2 = 330625 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (x_3 - \mu)^2 = (1250 - 1725)^2 = (-475)^2 = 225625 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (x_4 - \mu)^2 = (1750 - 1725)^2 = 25^2 = 625 \][/tex]
Summing these differences:
[tex]\[ 15625 + 330625 + 225625 + 625 = 572500 \][/tex]
Now, dividing by [tex]\(n-1 = 4-1 = 3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{572500}{3} \approx 190833.33 \][/tex]
Taking the square root gives the standard deviation:
[tex]\[ \sigma = \sqrt{190833.33} \approx 437.01 \text{ g} \][/tex]
Now, let's determine the classification based on accuracy and precision:
1. Accuracy: Given the accuracy threshold of 100g, our calculated accuracy of [tex]\(139.3\)[/tex] g indicates the measurements are not accurate.
2. Precision: Given the precision threshold of 200g, our calculated standard deviation of [tex]\(437.01\)[/tex] g indicates the measurements are not precise.
Given these conditions, the measurements are neither accurate nor precise.
Therefore, the best statement that describes the accuracy and precision of the data is:
A. Neither accurate nor precise
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.
