Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Which statement is true about the distance formula, [tex]d=\sqrt{\left(x_2-x_1\right)^2+\left(y_2-y_1\right)^2}[/tex], when describing the distance along a line segment?

A. It is not a precise definition because it uses variables to represent unknown values.
B. It is not a precise definition because it uses a square root sign, which means the result might be an irrational number.
C. It is not a precise definition because it is based on the difference of two coordinates.
D. It is not a precise definition because it is based on an understanding of coordinates, which are defined based on the distance of a line segment.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
Let's examine each of the statements provided to determine which is true about the distance formula [tex]\( d = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} \)[/tex]:

1. "It is not a precise definition because it uses variables to represent unknown values."
- The use of variables [tex]\( x_1, x_2, y_1, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y_2 \)[/tex] in the distance formula helps in generalizing the formula so that it can apply to any pair of points in a coordinate system. This makes the formula versatile and powerful, rather than imprecise.

2. "It is not a precise definition because it uses a square root sign, which means the result might be an irrational number."
- This statement is trying to highlight that the use of the square root in the formula can yield irrational numbers as results. While the formula can indeed result in irrational numbers (like [tex]\(\sqrt{2}\)[/tex]), this does not make the formula imprecise or incorrect. In mathematics, irrational numbers are just as valid as rational numbers, and the presence of such numbers does not affect the precision of the formula itself.

3. "It is not a precise definition because it is based on the difference of two coordinates."
- The distance formula is derived from the Pythagorean theorem and is precisely based on the differences between the coordinates of two points. This is not a shortcoming but rather a foundational aspect of the formula.

4. "It is not a precise definition because it is based on an understanding of coordinates, which are defined by the distance of a line segment."
- While coordinate geometry involves understanding coordinates and distances between points, describing this as an imprecision of the distance formula is inaccurate. The formula itself provides a consistent and precise method for calculating distance.

Examining these statements, the most accurate reason provided is:

"It is not a precise definition because it uses a square root sign, which means the result might be an irrational number."

Although the presence of irrational numbers might make the calculations more complex, it is the most relevant critique in the context of precision as outlined in the question. However, it's important to note that even though this statement is technically true, it does not imply that the formula is invalid or generally imprecise. It simply acknowledges that irrational results can occur, which is a natural aspect of mathematical calculations involving square roots.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.