At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's start by understanding the problem's requirements. We are given a domain of values: [tex]\(\{-2, 1, 5\}\)[/tex]. We need to find the range by applying the relation [tex]\(y = 4x\)[/tex] to each element of the domain.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Substitute each element of the domain into the relation [tex]\( y = 4x \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot (-2) = -8 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 1 = 4 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 5 = 20 \][/tex]
2. Collect the results to form the range:
The values we have calculated are [tex]\(-8\)[/tex], [tex]\(4\)[/tex], and [tex]\(20\)[/tex]. Therefore, the range for this relation is:
[tex]\[ \{-8, 4, 20\} \][/tex]
3. Compare the calculated range with the given options:
- Option 1: [tex]\(\{11, -1, -17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 2: [tex]\(\{-1, 4, 8\}\)[/tex]
- Option 3: [tex]\(\{-11, 1, 17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 4: [tex]\(\{-5, 7, 23\}\)[/tex]
Comparing our calculated range [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] with the options, none of the given options match exactly with our calculated range. If the problem involves a different target range or correct selections by choices, typically the choices provided might need scrutiny strictly.
Therefore, based on the step-by-step calculations, it seems none of the provided options directly match the calculated range. Possibly, the correct input option to match this calculation scenario would be logically re-examined or one should verify computation or formulated exact constraints in choice form.
However, ideally the expected correct choices might likely be factually based, then the system context of deriving [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] suggests verifying input provided clues variability analyzed correctly in scenarios overall.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Substitute each element of the domain into the relation [tex]\( y = 4x \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot (-2) = -8 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 1 = 4 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 5 = 20 \][/tex]
2. Collect the results to form the range:
The values we have calculated are [tex]\(-8\)[/tex], [tex]\(4\)[/tex], and [tex]\(20\)[/tex]. Therefore, the range for this relation is:
[tex]\[ \{-8, 4, 20\} \][/tex]
3. Compare the calculated range with the given options:
- Option 1: [tex]\(\{11, -1, -17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 2: [tex]\(\{-1, 4, 8\}\)[/tex]
- Option 3: [tex]\(\{-11, 1, 17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 4: [tex]\(\{-5, 7, 23\}\)[/tex]
Comparing our calculated range [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] with the options, none of the given options match exactly with our calculated range. If the problem involves a different target range or correct selections by choices, typically the choices provided might need scrutiny strictly.
Therefore, based on the step-by-step calculations, it seems none of the provided options directly match the calculated range. Possibly, the correct input option to match this calculation scenario would be logically re-examined or one should verify computation or formulated exact constraints in choice form.
However, ideally the expected correct choices might likely be factually based, then the system context of deriving [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] suggests verifying input provided clues variability analyzed correctly in scenarios overall.
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.