Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Let's start by understanding the problem's requirements. We are given a domain of values: [tex]\(\{-2, 1, 5\}\)[/tex]. We need to find the range by applying the relation [tex]\(y = 4x\)[/tex] to each element of the domain.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Substitute each element of the domain into the relation [tex]\( y = 4x \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot (-2) = -8 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 1 = 4 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 5 = 20 \][/tex]
2. Collect the results to form the range:
The values we have calculated are [tex]\(-8\)[/tex], [tex]\(4\)[/tex], and [tex]\(20\)[/tex]. Therefore, the range for this relation is:
[tex]\[ \{-8, 4, 20\} \][/tex]
3. Compare the calculated range with the given options:
- Option 1: [tex]\(\{11, -1, -17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 2: [tex]\(\{-1, 4, 8\}\)[/tex]
- Option 3: [tex]\(\{-11, 1, 17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 4: [tex]\(\{-5, 7, 23\}\)[/tex]
Comparing our calculated range [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] with the options, none of the given options match exactly with our calculated range. If the problem involves a different target range or correct selections by choices, typically the choices provided might need scrutiny strictly.
Therefore, based on the step-by-step calculations, it seems none of the provided options directly match the calculated range. Possibly, the correct input option to match this calculation scenario would be logically re-examined or one should verify computation or formulated exact constraints in choice form.
However, ideally the expected correct choices might likely be factually based, then the system context of deriving [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] suggests verifying input provided clues variability analyzed correctly in scenarios overall.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Substitute each element of the domain into the relation [tex]\( y = 4x \)[/tex]:
- For [tex]\( x = -2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot (-2) = -8 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 1 = 4 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 4 \cdot 5 = 20 \][/tex]
2. Collect the results to form the range:
The values we have calculated are [tex]\(-8\)[/tex], [tex]\(4\)[/tex], and [tex]\(20\)[/tex]. Therefore, the range for this relation is:
[tex]\[ \{-8, 4, 20\} \][/tex]
3. Compare the calculated range with the given options:
- Option 1: [tex]\(\{11, -1, -17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 2: [tex]\(\{-1, 4, 8\}\)[/tex]
- Option 3: [tex]\(\{-11, 1, 17\}\)[/tex]
- Option 4: [tex]\(\{-5, 7, 23\}\)[/tex]
Comparing our calculated range [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] with the options, none of the given options match exactly with our calculated range. If the problem involves a different target range or correct selections by choices, typically the choices provided might need scrutiny strictly.
Therefore, based on the step-by-step calculations, it seems none of the provided options directly match the calculated range. Possibly, the correct input option to match this calculation scenario would be logically re-examined or one should verify computation or formulated exact constraints in choice form.
However, ideally the expected correct choices might likely be factually based, then the system context of deriving [tex]\(\{-8, 4, 20\}\)[/tex] suggests verifying input provided clues variability analyzed correctly in scenarios overall.
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.