Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Let's solve the question step-by-step as a math teacher.
### Part a) State an appropriate domain and range for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]
To determine the domain for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], we observe the intervals given in the table. The intervals for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 1 \leq x < 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]. Collectively, these intervals cover [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]. Hence, the domain of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \text{Domain of } f(x): \quad 0 \leq x < 5 \][/tex]
To determine the range for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], we need to examine how [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] changes across these intervals.
- Let's assume [tex]\( f(0) = 0 \)[/tex] for simplicity.
- From [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 3.1, so [tex]\( f(1) = 3.1 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 1 \leq x < 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 3.8, so [tex]\( f(2) = 3.1 + 3.8 = 6.9 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 4.0, so [tex]\( f(3) = 6.9 + 4.0 = 10.9 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 4.2, so [tex]\( f(4) = 10.9 + 4.2 = 15.1 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 4.4, so [tex]\( f(5) = 15.1 + 4.4 = 19.5 \)[/tex].
Therefore, the range of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] varies from [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \text{Range of } f(x): \quad 0 \leq f(x) \leq 19.5 \][/tex]
### Part b) Determine the rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on the sub-interval [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]
To calculate the rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on the sub-interval [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex], we consider the intervals [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex].
The changes in [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] in these intervals are:
- For [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], the change is 4.0.
- For [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], the change is 4.2.
- For [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex], the change is 4.4.
The average rate of change in these intervals:
[tex]\[ \text{Rate of Change} = \frac{4.0 + 4.2 + 4.4}{3} = \frac{12.6}{3} = 4.2 \][/tex]
So, the rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on the interval [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ 4.2 \][/tex]
### Part c) Which of the functions is best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes?
To decide which function is best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes, we need to analyze the changes in each function over the intervals.
- [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] shows consistent positive changes (3.1, 3.8, 4.0, 4.2, 4.4). This indicates a single increasing slope with slight variation but not distinctively two different slopes.
- [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] changes as (2.1, 1.9, -4.0, -4.1, -4.1). Initially, there is a positive slope (increasing), followed by a negative slope (decreasing).
- [tex]\( h(x) \)[/tex] changes as (3.3, 3.1, 2.9, 2.7, 2.5). This shows a consistently decreasing rate but not distinctly two linear segments with different slopes.
Thus, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes because it shows a distinct increase initially and then a consistent decrease.
In conclusion:
- Domain of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]
- Range of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 0 \leq f(x) \leq 19.5 \)[/tex]
- Rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4.2 \)[/tex]
- Function best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes: [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]
### Part a) State an appropriate domain and range for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]
To determine the domain for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], we observe the intervals given in the table. The intervals for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 1 \leq x < 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]. Collectively, these intervals cover [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]. Hence, the domain of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \text{Domain of } f(x): \quad 0 \leq x < 5 \][/tex]
To determine the range for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], we need to examine how [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] changes across these intervals.
- Let's assume [tex]\( f(0) = 0 \)[/tex] for simplicity.
- From [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 3.1, so [tex]\( f(1) = 3.1 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 1 \leq x < 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 3.8, so [tex]\( f(2) = 3.1 + 3.8 = 6.9 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 4.0, so [tex]\( f(3) = 6.9 + 4.0 = 10.9 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 4.2, so [tex]\( f(4) = 10.9 + 4.2 = 15.1 \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] increases by 4.4, so [tex]\( f(5) = 15.1 + 4.4 = 19.5 \)[/tex].
Therefore, the range of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] varies from [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \text{Range of } f(x): \quad 0 \leq f(x) \leq 19.5 \][/tex]
### Part b) Determine the rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on the sub-interval [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]
To calculate the rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on the sub-interval [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex], we consider the intervals [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex].
The changes in [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] in these intervals are:
- For [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 3 \)[/tex], the change is 4.0.
- For [tex]\( 3 \leq x < 4 \)[/tex], the change is 4.2.
- For [tex]\( 4 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex], the change is 4.4.
The average rate of change in these intervals:
[tex]\[ \text{Rate of Change} = \frac{4.0 + 4.2 + 4.4}{3} = \frac{12.6}{3} = 4.2 \][/tex]
So, the rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on the interval [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ 4.2 \][/tex]
### Part c) Which of the functions is best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes?
To decide which function is best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes, we need to analyze the changes in each function over the intervals.
- [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] shows consistent positive changes (3.1, 3.8, 4.0, 4.2, 4.4). This indicates a single increasing slope with slight variation but not distinctively two different slopes.
- [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] changes as (2.1, 1.9, -4.0, -4.1, -4.1). Initially, there is a positive slope (increasing), followed by a negative slope (decreasing).
- [tex]\( h(x) \)[/tex] changes as (3.3, 3.1, 2.9, 2.7, 2.5). This shows a consistently decreasing rate but not distinctly two linear segments with different slopes.
Thus, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes because it shows a distinct increase initially and then a consistent decrease.
In conclusion:
- Domain of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 0 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]
- Range of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 0 \leq f(x) \leq 19.5 \)[/tex]
- Rate of change for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] on [tex]\( 2 \leq x < 5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4.2 \)[/tex]
- Function best modeled by a piecewise-linear function with two linear segments with different slopes: [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.
