Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To solve the linear programming problem, we need to use the standard methods for optimization while taking into account the provided constraints. The goal is to minimize the objective function [tex]\( z = 4x_1 + x_2 \)[/tex].
Let's start by rewriting the problem:
### Objective
[tex]\[ \text{Minimize } z = 4x_1 + x_2 \][/tex]
### Subject to
[tex]\[ \begin{aligned} 3x_1 + x_2 &= 30 \quad \text{(Constraint 1)} \\ 4x_1 + 3x_2 &> 60 \quad \text{(Constraint 2)} \\ x_1 + 2x_2 &\leq 40 \quad \text{(Constraint 3)} \\ x_1, x_2 &\geq 0 \quad \text{(Non-negativity)} \end{aligned} \][/tex]
Before we proceed, let's address the inequalities to convert them into standard form:
- The second constraint, [tex]\(4x_1 + 3x_2 > 60\)[/tex], can be rewritten as [tex]\(-4x_1 - 3x_2 \leq -60\)[/tex].
- The third constraint, [tex]\(x_1 + 2x_2 \leq 40\)[/tex], remains as is.
Now, let's summarize these constraints in the standard form compatible with optimization techniques:
### Constraints in Standard Form:
[tex]\[ \begin{aligned} 3x_1 + x_2 &= 30 \quad \text{(Equality Constraint)} \\ -4x_1 - 3x_2 &\leq -60 \quad \text{(Inequality Constraint 1)} \\ x_1 + 2x_2 &\leq 40 \quad \text{(Inequality Constraint 2)} \\ x_1, x_2 &\geq 0 \quad \text{(Bounds)} \end{aligned} \][/tex]
Given these constraints and the objective function, we can solve the optimization problem.
### Solution:
After solving the problem step-by-step using the appropriate linear programming methods, we find that the optimal solution for the decision variables is:
[tex]\[ x_1 = 4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 = 18 \][/tex]
Substituting these values back into the objective function yields:
[tex]\[ z = 4(4) + 18 = 16 + 18 = 34 \][/tex]
Thus, the minimized value of the objective function [tex]\( z \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ z = 34 \][/tex]
### Conclusion:
The optimal solution to the given linear programming problem is:
[tex]\[ x_1 = 4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 = 18 \][/tex]
And the minimized value of [tex]\( z \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ z = 34 \][/tex]
Let's start by rewriting the problem:
### Objective
[tex]\[ \text{Minimize } z = 4x_1 + x_2 \][/tex]
### Subject to
[tex]\[ \begin{aligned} 3x_1 + x_2 &= 30 \quad \text{(Constraint 1)} \\ 4x_1 + 3x_2 &> 60 \quad \text{(Constraint 2)} \\ x_1 + 2x_2 &\leq 40 \quad \text{(Constraint 3)} \\ x_1, x_2 &\geq 0 \quad \text{(Non-negativity)} \end{aligned} \][/tex]
Before we proceed, let's address the inequalities to convert them into standard form:
- The second constraint, [tex]\(4x_1 + 3x_2 > 60\)[/tex], can be rewritten as [tex]\(-4x_1 - 3x_2 \leq -60\)[/tex].
- The third constraint, [tex]\(x_1 + 2x_2 \leq 40\)[/tex], remains as is.
Now, let's summarize these constraints in the standard form compatible with optimization techniques:
### Constraints in Standard Form:
[tex]\[ \begin{aligned} 3x_1 + x_2 &= 30 \quad \text{(Equality Constraint)} \\ -4x_1 - 3x_2 &\leq -60 \quad \text{(Inequality Constraint 1)} \\ x_1 + 2x_2 &\leq 40 \quad \text{(Inequality Constraint 2)} \\ x_1, x_2 &\geq 0 \quad \text{(Bounds)} \end{aligned} \][/tex]
Given these constraints and the objective function, we can solve the optimization problem.
### Solution:
After solving the problem step-by-step using the appropriate linear programming methods, we find that the optimal solution for the decision variables is:
[tex]\[ x_1 = 4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 = 18 \][/tex]
Substituting these values back into the objective function yields:
[tex]\[ z = 4(4) + 18 = 16 + 18 = 34 \][/tex]
Thus, the minimized value of the objective function [tex]\( z \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ z = 34 \][/tex]
### Conclusion:
The optimal solution to the given linear programming problem is:
[tex]\[ x_1 = 4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 = 18 \][/tex]
And the minimized value of [tex]\( z \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ z = 34 \][/tex]
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.