Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.

The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.

What type of fallacy does this argument represent?

hasty generalization
ad populum
begging the claim
genetic fallacy

Sagot :

Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.