Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.

The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.

What type of fallacy does this argument represent?

hasty generalization
ad populum
begging the claim
genetic fallacy

Sagot :

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.