Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine the best seating section for Leanne's family to maximize their chances of having a "perfect" view of the symphony's soloist, we need to analyze the data given for each section. The relevant data includes the number of reviewers in each section and the number of those reviewers who rated the view as "perfect."
Here is the data presented:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text{Section} & \text{Number of Reviewers} & \text{Number of Perfect Ratings} \\ \hline L1 & 90 & 57 \\ \hline L2 & 52 & 33 \\ \hline L3 & 75 & 47 \\ \hline U1 & 84 & 55 \\ \hline U2 & 43 & 27 \\ \hline U3 & 35 & 22 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
To find out which section has the highest chances of giving a "perfect" view, we need to calculate the ratio of "perfect" reviews to the total number of reviewers for each section. This ratio can be found using the following formula:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{\text{Number of Perfect Ratings}}{\text{Number of Reviewers}} \][/tex]
Let's calculate the ratio for each section:
Section L1:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{57}{90} \approx 0.6333 \][/tex]
Section L2:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{33}{52} \approx 0.6346 \][/tex]
Section L3:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{47}{75} \approx 0.6267 \][/tex]
Section U1:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{55}{84} \approx 0.6548 \][/tex]
Section U2:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{27}{43} \approx 0.6279 \][/tex]
Section U3:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{22}{35} \approx 0.6286 \][/tex]
Now, let's compare these ratios:
- L1: [tex]\(0.6333\)[/tex]
- L2: [tex]\(0.6346\)[/tex]
- L3: [tex]\(0.6267\)[/tex]
- U1: [tex]\(0.6548\)[/tex]
- U2: [tex]\(0.6279\)[/tex]
- U3: [tex]\(0.6286\)[/tex]
We observe that Section U1 has the highest ratio of [tex]\(0.6548\)[/tex].
Therefore, Leanne's family should book their tickets in Section U1 to maximize their chances of having a "perfect" view of the symphony's soloist.
Here is the data presented:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text{Section} & \text{Number of Reviewers} & \text{Number of Perfect Ratings} \\ \hline L1 & 90 & 57 \\ \hline L2 & 52 & 33 \\ \hline L3 & 75 & 47 \\ \hline U1 & 84 & 55 \\ \hline U2 & 43 & 27 \\ \hline U3 & 35 & 22 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
To find out which section has the highest chances of giving a "perfect" view, we need to calculate the ratio of "perfect" reviews to the total number of reviewers for each section. This ratio can be found using the following formula:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{\text{Number of Perfect Ratings}}{\text{Number of Reviewers}} \][/tex]
Let's calculate the ratio for each section:
Section L1:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{57}{90} \approx 0.6333 \][/tex]
Section L2:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{33}{52} \approx 0.6346 \][/tex]
Section L3:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{47}{75} \approx 0.6267 \][/tex]
Section U1:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{55}{84} \approx 0.6548 \][/tex]
Section U2:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{27}{43} \approx 0.6279 \][/tex]
Section U3:
[tex]\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{22}{35} \approx 0.6286 \][/tex]
Now, let's compare these ratios:
- L1: [tex]\(0.6333\)[/tex]
- L2: [tex]\(0.6346\)[/tex]
- L3: [tex]\(0.6267\)[/tex]
- U1: [tex]\(0.6548\)[/tex]
- U2: [tex]\(0.6279\)[/tex]
- U3: [tex]\(0.6286\)[/tex]
We observe that Section U1 has the highest ratio of [tex]\(0.6548\)[/tex].
Therefore, Leanne's family should book their tickets in Section U1 to maximize their chances of having a "perfect" view of the symphony's soloist.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.