Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

The Supreme Court has ruled that:

A. Public figures have less protection from the press than other members of the public.
B. Public figures have the same protection from the press as other members of the public.
C. Public figures have more protection from the press than other members of the public.
D. Only political public figures have as much protection from the press as other members of the public.
E. Only nonpolitical public figures have as much protection from the press as other members of the public.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Public figures have less protection from the press as affirmed by the Supreme Court in cases such as New York Times v. Sullivan.


Explanation:

Public figures have less protection from the press than other members of the public, as ruled by the Supreme Court. This limitation on protection is evidenced in cases like New York Times v. Sullivan, where public figures are required to demonstrate malicious intent or reckless disregard for the truth in order to prevail in defamation lawsuits.


Learn more about Freedom of the press here:

https://brainly.com/question/44025131


Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.