Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

The Supreme Court has ruled that:

A. Public figures have less protection from the press than other members of the public.
B. Public figures have the same protection from the press as other members of the public.
C. Public figures have more protection from the press than other members of the public.
D. Only political public figures have as much protection from the press as other members of the public.
E. Only nonpolitical public figures have as much protection from the press as other members of the public.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Public figures have less protection from the press as affirmed by the Supreme Court in cases such as New York Times v. Sullivan.


Explanation:

Public figures have less protection from the press than other members of the public, as ruled by the Supreme Court. This limitation on protection is evidenced in cases like New York Times v. Sullivan, where public figures are required to demonstrate malicious intent or reckless disregard for the truth in order to prevail in defamation lawsuits.


Learn more about Freedom of the press here:

https://brainly.com/question/44025131


We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.