Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
The students only tested the drinking water supplied by the lake. This 80% may not contain the bacterial infection, but the other 20% from unknown sources(which they didn't account for in their conclusion) may.
OPTIONS:
a. Water from the late was not tested for other possible pathogens b. Residents of other nearby towns were not tested for the bacteria c. The residents' genetic predisposition for getting ill was not determined d. Other sources of drinking water were not tested for bacteria
Answer:
d. Other sources of drinking water were not tested for bacteria
Explanation:
The source of error in the experimental design of the students stems from the failure to collect samples from other sources of the town's drinking water. The samples collected and tested were simply unrepresentative of the drinking water supply of the town, as the samples collected only represented water from the lake, which is 80% of the town's supplies of drinking water.
To arrive at a good conclusion, samples collected should represent adequately, all sources of drinking water of the town, rather than just representing supply from mainly the lake, which accounts for 80%.
It could be that the source of bacterial infection might emanate from other sources of drinking water that was not represented in the samples collected for testing.
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.