Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
The students only tested the drinking water supplied by the lake. This 80% may not contain the bacterial infection, but the other 20% from unknown sources(which they didn't account for in their conclusion) may.
OPTIONS:
a. Water from the late was not tested for other possible pathogens b. Residents of other nearby towns were not tested for the bacteria c. The residents' genetic predisposition for getting ill was not determined d. Other sources of drinking water were not tested for bacteria
Answer:
d. Other sources of drinking water were not tested for bacteria
Explanation:
The source of error in the experimental design of the students stems from the failure to collect samples from other sources of the town's drinking water. The samples collected and tested were simply unrepresentative of the drinking water supply of the town, as the samples collected only represented water from the lake, which is 80% of the town's supplies of drinking water.
To arrive at a good conclusion, samples collected should represent adequately, all sources of drinking water of the town, rather than just representing supply from mainly the lake, which accounts for 80%.
It could be that the source of bacterial infection might emanate from other sources of drinking water that was not represented in the samples collected for testing.
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.