Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
The students only tested the drinking water supplied by the lake. This 80% may not contain the bacterial infection, but the other 20% from unknown sources(which they didn't account for in their conclusion) may.
OPTIONS:
a. Water from the late was not tested for other possible pathogens b. Residents of other nearby towns were not tested for the bacteria c. The residents' genetic predisposition for getting ill was not determined d. Other sources of drinking water were not tested for bacteria
Answer:
d. Other sources of drinking water were not tested for bacteria
Explanation:
The source of error in the experimental design of the students stems from the failure to collect samples from other sources of the town's drinking water. The samples collected and tested were simply unrepresentative of the drinking water supply of the town, as the samples collected only represented water from the lake, which is 80% of the town's supplies of drinking water.
To arrive at a good conclusion, samples collected should represent adequately, all sources of drinking water of the town, rather than just representing supply from mainly the lake, which accounts for 80%.
It could be that the source of bacterial infection might emanate from other sources of drinking water that was not represented in the samples collected for testing.
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.