At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
A). No. Even end-to-end, the 5 and the 3 couldn't cover the 9.
B). Technically yes, but not really. End-to-end, the 5 and the 2 would lay down
right on top of the 7. It would be a triangle with two angles of 0° and one angle
of 180°. The base would be 7, the height would be zero, and the whole thing
would just look like a piece of line.
C). No. Even end-to-end, the 2 and the other 2 couldn't cover the 5.
D). Yes. A cute little scalene triangle.
B). Technically yes, but not really. End-to-end, the 5 and the 2 would lay down
right on top of the 7. It would be a triangle with two angles of 0° and one angle
of 180°. The base would be 7, the height would be zero, and the whole thing
would just look like a piece of line.
C). No. Even end-to-end, the 2 and the other 2 couldn't cover the 5.
D). Yes. A cute little scalene triangle.
[tex]a,b,c-lengts\ of\ the\ sides\ of\ a\ triangle\\\\If\ a\leq b\leq c\ then\ a+b > c\\\\A.\\5+3=8\not>9-NO\\B.\\5+2=7\not>7-NO\\C.\\2+2=4\not>5-NO\\D.\\5+3=8 > 7-YES[/tex]
[tex]Answer:D[/tex]
[tex]Answer:D[/tex]
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.