Answered

Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

A lack of Vitamin D is said to be detrimental to the maintenance of bone density. If a
scientist wanted to determine whether this view was supported by scientific evidence,
which of the following would be the best method of doing so?
(a) carry out a survey of people with normal bone density to find out whether they
take Vitamin D tablets or not
(b) compare the bone density of two groups of people with low bone density after
providing only one of the groups with Vitamin D
(c) compare the incidence of people with low bone density in two different populations
(d) carry out an experiment in which a group of people with normal bone density are
exposed to very little sunlight to prevent the production of Vitamin D

Sagot :

brittanycandace
i would do B because then you can compare people who do take Vitamin D to people who don't and then you can see who has better bones and the effects. 
D is also a good option because when their little production of vitamin D we can easily determine what is the effect of this experiment to the bone density...
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.