Answered

Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

A lack of Vitamin D is said to be detrimental to the maintenance of bone density. If a
scientist wanted to determine whether this view was supported by scientific evidence,
which of the following would be the best method of doing so?
(a) carry out a survey of people with normal bone density to find out whether they
take Vitamin D tablets or not
(b) compare the bone density of two groups of people with low bone density after
providing only one of the groups with Vitamin D
(c) compare the incidence of people with low bone density in two different populations
(d) carry out an experiment in which a group of people with normal bone density are
exposed to very little sunlight to prevent the production of Vitamin D

Sagot :

brittanycandace
i would do B because then you can compare people who do take Vitamin D to people who don't and then you can see who has better bones and the effects. 
D is also a good option because when their little production of vitamin D we can easily determine what is the effect of this experiment to the bone density...
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.