Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Let's call the number of rows 'R' . (Clever ?)
There are (3x -2) trees in each row, and there are 'R' rows,
so the total number of trees is [ R times (3x-2) ].
But the problem told you that the total number of trees is (24x-16).
So
R(3x - 2) = (24x - 16)
For a quick, happy ending, how about factoring '8' out of the right side:
R(3x - 2) = 8(3x - 2)
Is it jumping out at you yet ?
If not, then divide each side by (3x - 2) :
R = 8
There are eight (8) rows of trees.
There are (3x -2) trees in each row, and there are 'R' rows,
so the total number of trees is [ R times (3x-2) ].
But the problem told you that the total number of trees is (24x-16).
So
R(3x - 2) = (24x - 16)
For a quick, happy ending, how about factoring '8' out of the right side:
R(3x - 2) = 8(3x - 2)
Is it jumping out at you yet ?
If not, then divide each side by (3x - 2) :
R = 8
There are eight (8) rows of trees.
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.