Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's call the number of rows 'R' . (Clever ?)
There are (3x -2) trees in each row, and there are 'R' rows,
so the total number of trees is [ R times (3x-2) ].
But the problem told you that the total number of trees is (24x-16).
So
R(3x - 2) = (24x - 16)
For a quick, happy ending, how about factoring '8' out of the right side:
R(3x - 2) = 8(3x - 2)
Is it jumping out at you yet ?
If not, then divide each side by (3x - 2) :
R = 8
There are eight (8) rows of trees.
There are (3x -2) trees in each row, and there are 'R' rows,
so the total number of trees is [ R times (3x-2) ].
But the problem told you that the total number of trees is (24x-16).
So
R(3x - 2) = (24x - 16)
For a quick, happy ending, how about factoring '8' out of the right side:
R(3x - 2) = 8(3x - 2)
Is it jumping out at you yet ?
If not, then divide each side by (3x - 2) :
R = 8
There are eight (8) rows of trees.
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.