Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
We could do it with algebra. But we can also do it the long way, which is
shorter than the algebraic way.
The digit in the tens place is 3 times the digit in the units place.
So the number MUST be
31, or
62, or
93 .
It can't be anything else.
Now here they are again, with the reverse of each one:
31 . . . 13 The new number is 18 less.
62 . . . 26 The new number is 36 less.
93 . . . 39 The new number is 54 less.
Obviously, the original number is 62.
shorter than the algebraic way.
The digit in the tens place is 3 times the digit in the units place.
So the number MUST be
31, or
62, or
93 .
It can't be anything else.
Now here they are again, with the reverse of each one:
31 . . . 13 The new number is 18 less.
62 . . . 26 The new number is 36 less.
93 . . . 39 The new number is 54 less.
Obviously, the original number is 62.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.