Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Discover in-depth solutions to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
Yes, they were unethical.
Explanation:
Yes, the Tuskegee syphilis study and diethylstilbestrol study on pregnant women were both unethical because it is illegal and inhuman to conduct medical experiments on humans without informed consent and agreement.
Both these two experiments were conducted without informing the patients of what actually they were being prescribed and observed for.
In the case of Tuskegee syphilis study, the patients were told that they were being observed and treated for deficient blood while in diethylstilbestrol study on pregnant women, most of them weren't even informed of the experiment. Therefore, these studies were completely unethical human experimentation.
Tuskegee syphilis and the diethylstilbestrol study on the pregnant women were seen as both unethical as it is illegal and inhuman.
What is the Tuskegee syphilis study ?
The study is an experiment that was conducted between the 1932 and 1972 by the UNPS that is united nations public health services. It was taken up by the center of disease control and prevention. The main aim was to study and observe the diseases when untreated. The initial experiments were made of 6 months.
Find out more information about the Tuskegee syphilis.
brainly.com/question/928758.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.
