Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Since 2.1387 is Greater Than 1.645;
we reject null hypothesis; we conclude that, the nickname is justified based on the data.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data in the question;
Null hypothesis H₀ : p = 0.262
Alternative Hypothesis H₁ : p > 0.262.
p" = 0.357
q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.262 = 0.738
n = 98
so;
z = (p" - p) / √(pq/n)
we substitute
z = (0.357 - 0.262) / √((0.262×0.738) / 98)
z = 0.095 / 0.04441869
z = 2.1387
at 5% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
z-critical = 1.645
Since 2.1387 is Greater Than 1.645;
we reject null hypothesis; we conclude that, the nickname is justified based on the data.
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.