Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Suppose that a person was aware of some corruption that was occurring in the government agency in which she or he worked. What should a person in this situation do? Would it be plausible to be a whistle-blower? What are the possible implications for reporting the corruption? Is it honest and ethical to engage in whistle-blowing? If this type of corruption was not reported, would ignoring the situation be indicative of honest and ethical behavior on the part of the person who was aware of the situation at hand? Explain

Sagot :

gabbymoosh

Ignoring the situation is the easy way out,

but exposing the corruption in the government is the right thing to do.

If there's duplicity, it should be restrained. Being a whistle-blower alerts others to what is going on, but it's safe to be discreet. It saves people from getting screwed over, and or put in danger. Wrong doings should always get exposed.

We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.