Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Suppose that a person was aware of some corruption that was occurring in the government agency in which she or he worked. What should a person in this situation do? Would it be plausible to be a whistle-blower? What are the possible implications for reporting the corruption? Is it honest and ethical to engage in whistle-blowing? If this type of corruption was not reported, would ignoring the situation be indicative of honest and ethical behavior on the part of the person who was aware of the situation at hand? Explain

Sagot :

gabbymoosh

Ignoring the situation is the easy way out,

but exposing the corruption in the government is the right thing to do.

If there's duplicity, it should be restrained. Being a whistle-blower alerts others to what is going on, but it's safe to be discreet. It saves people from getting screwed over, and or put in danger. Wrong doings should always get exposed.

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.