Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Solution:
To test the hypothesis is that the mean ozone level is different from 4.40 parts per million at 1% of significance level.
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis is :
[tex]$H_0: \mu = 4.40$[/tex]
[tex]$H_a: \mu \neq 4.40$[/tex]
The z-test statistics is :
[tex]$z=\frac{\overline x - \mu}{\left( \sigma / \sqrt n \right)} $[/tex]
[tex]$z=\frac{4.2 - 4.4}{\left(0.7 / \sqrt{23} \right)} $[/tex]
[tex]$z =\frac{-0.2}{0.145}$[/tex]
z = -1.37
The z critical value for the two tailed test at 99% confidence level is from the standard normal table, he z critical value for a two tailed at 99% confidence is 2.57
So the z critical value for a two tailed test at 99% confidence is ± 2.57
Conclusion :
The z values corresponding to the sample statistics falls in the critical region, so the null hypothesis is to be rejected at 1% level of significance. There is a sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean ozone level is different from 4.4 parts per million. The result is statistically significant.
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
