Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
There are different kinds of laws. The State governments joined in this effort to drive Native Americans out of the South.
- Here, a lot of states passed laws that hinders the Native American sovereignty and rights and said that they were encroaching on their territory.
- In Cherokee Nation, the Court was said to have ruled that it lacked the power to hear a case to look at claims of an Indian nation within the United States.
In Worcester, the was said to have Court ruled that the United States, are the only ones and not the individual states, that had power to monitor or deal with Indian nations.
In Worcester v. Georgia of 1832?
In Worcester v. Georgia case of 1832, the U.S. Supreme Court was against the practices and stated that native nations were sovereign nations.
Southern states wanted to take ownership of Indian lands and they said that they would go to great lengths to have that territory.
Learn more about the Trail of Tears from
https://brainly.com/question/11527437
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.