Answered

Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Julia is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠FHD in her sketch. What is the missing justification in the proof?

Segment AB is parallel to segment CD, and transversal EF intersects segment AB at G and segment CD at H.

Statement Justification
segment AB is parallel to segment CD with transversal segment EF Given
m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB Vertical Angles Theorem
m∠HGB ≅ m∠FHD
∠AGE ≅ ∠FHD Transitive Property
Group of answer choices

Alternate Exterior Angles Theorem

Corresponding Angles Theorem

Reflexive Property

Substitution Property​

Sagot :

The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem

What is the angle theorem used?

We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.

Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.

In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.

Read more about Angle theorem at; https://brainly.com/question/24839702

#SPJ1

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.