Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Here is what we know:
Sample size: 80 people
Mean consumption by a person from the sample: 3.2 pounds
Sample standard deviation: 1.22 pounds
Tuna consumption according to the nutritionist claims: 3.5 pounds
Alpha: 0.07
First, we compute the standard deviation of the mean:
[tex]\sigma_{\mu}=\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}=\frac{1.22}{\sqrt{80}}\approx0.136\text{ pounds}[/tex]Then, the z score for the nutritionist claims is given by:
[tex]Z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma_{\mu}}=\frac{3.5-3.2}{0.136}\approx2.2[/tex]Then, according to a normal table, we have:
[tex]P(Z\ge2.2)+P(Z\leq2.2)=2\cdot(0.5-0.4861)=0.0278[/tex]We can check that 0.0278 < 0.07, therefore the null hypothesis, is rejected.
The null hypothesis is given by:
[tex]\begin{gathered} P(z\leq Z_{null})+P(z\ge Z_{null})\ge1-0.07=0.93 \\ According\text{ to the normal table: }Z_{null}=\pm1.81 \\ =\frac{x_{null}-\mu}{\sigma_{\mu}} \\ \pm1.81=\frac{x_{null}-3.2}{0.136} \\ x_{null}=3.2\pm1.81\cdot0.136\approx3.2\pm0.25 \\ null\text{ hypothesis: 2.95}\leq x\text{ }\leq\text{ 3.45} \\ Alternative\text{ hypothesis: }x\leq2.95\text{ or }x\ge3.45 \end{gathered}[/tex]Null hypothesis: 2.95 <= x <= 3.45
Alternative hypothesis: x <= 2.95 or x >= 3.45
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.