At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Which fallacy involves a conclusion that does not logically follow an explanation given?
O ad hominem
red herring
Onon sequitur
Ocircular logic

Sagot :

Final answer:

The Non Sequitur Fallacy involves a conclusion that does not logically follow an explanation, making the argument invalid due to a lack of proper connection between premises and conclusion.


Explanation:

The fallacy that involves a conclusion that does not logically follow an explanation given is the Non Sequitur Fallacy. This fallacy, derived from Latin for 'does not follow,' occurs when the premises have no logical connection with or relevance to the conclusion.

It is a type of logical fallacy where the argument's structure is invalid due to the lack of a proper connection between the premises and the conclusion, rendering the argument unsound.

An example of a non sequitur fallacy would be: 'All mammals are warm-blooded. Birds are warm-blooded. Therefore, all birds are mammals,' which lacks logical coherence.


Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484


Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.