Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Which fallacy involves a conclusion that does not logically follow an explanation given?
O ad hominem
red herring
Onon sequitur
Ocircular logic

Sagot :

Final answer:

The Non Sequitur Fallacy involves a conclusion that does not logically follow an explanation, making the argument invalid due to a lack of proper connection between premises and conclusion.


Explanation:

The fallacy that involves a conclusion that does not logically follow an explanation given is the Non Sequitur Fallacy. This fallacy, derived from Latin for 'does not follow,' occurs when the premises have no logical connection with or relevance to the conclusion.

It is a type of logical fallacy where the argument's structure is invalid due to the lack of a proper connection between the premises and the conclusion, rendering the argument unsound.

An example of a non sequitur fallacy would be: 'All mammals are warm-blooded. Birds are warm-blooded. Therefore, all birds are mammals,' which lacks logical coherence.


Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484