Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

A production line operation is designed to fill cartons with laundry detergent to a mean weight of 32 ounces. A sample of cartons is periodically selected and weighed to determine whether underfilling or overfilling is occurring. If the sample data lead to a conclusion of underfilling or overfilling (in other words, if they lead to a conclusion that the mean weight is different from 32 ounces), the production line will be shut down and adjusted to obtain proper filling. What conclusion is appropriate when H0 cannot be rejected

Sagot :

fichoh

Answer:

There is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean weight of laundry detergent is being underfilled or overfilled.

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis ; H0 : μ = 32

The alternative hypothesis : H1 : μ ≠ 32

The null hypothesis is the initial truth statement, therefore, when the Null hypothesis cannot be rejected, the conclusion goes thus :

There is no significant evidence to conclude that there is difference in the mean weight of laundry detergent. Hence, detergent is neither being underfilled or overfilled.

We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.