nightwolf809z
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

DISCUSSION TOPIC PLEASE HELP
The focus of this unit is understanding geometry using positions of points in a Cartesian coordinate system. The study of the relationship between algebra and geometry was pioneered by the French mathematician and philosopher René Descartes. In fact, the Cartesian coordinate system is named after him. The study of geometry that uses coordinates in this manner is called analytical geometry.

How does this approach differ from other approaches to geometry that you have used or seen? Based on your experiences so far, which approach to geometry do you prefer? Why? Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions? What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other? Describe the situation and why you think one approach is more applicable.

Sagot :

pomeroytraiden

Answer:

I think this approach is easier because it is better for me to understand or hear in a way that makes sense.

(Hope this helps <3)

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.