nightwolf809z
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

DISCUSSION TOPIC PLEASE HELP
The focus of this unit is understanding geometry using positions of points in a Cartesian coordinate system. The study of the relationship between algebra and geometry was pioneered by the French mathematician and philosopher René Descartes. In fact, the Cartesian coordinate system is named after him. The study of geometry that uses coordinates in this manner is called analytical geometry.

How does this approach differ from other approaches to geometry that you have used or seen? Based on your experiences so far, which approach to geometry do you prefer? Why? Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions? What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other? Describe the situation and why you think one approach is more applicable.

Sagot :

pomeroytraiden

Answer:

I think this approach is easier because it is better for me to understand or hear in a way that makes sense.

(Hope this helps <3)

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.